Sneaker reader: Bootstrapper consists of lights and cameras that reside in a box below a touch-screen table.
Credit: Hasso Plattner Institute
Computing
Tabletop Computer Knows You by Your Shoes
A system with foot-level cameras aims to cure the problem of multiple people using one touch screen.
- Monday, January 23, 2012
- By Kate Greene
New research from the Hasso Plattner Institute in Potsdam, Germany, aims to quell the frustration and strife that can come when multiple people use a single touch screen. The project, called Bootstrapper, uses cameras below a table to identify different users by their shoes. Each set of shoes is linked to an account that keeps track of a person's actions and preferences.
Unlike other approaches to differentiating between users, Bootstrapper uses low-cost hardware and allows a person's hands to freely interact with the surface. As an added benefit, a user's preferences can be stored according to her shoes, so when she leaves the table, it's easier to resume an activity when she returns.
Previous approaches to the problem have involved affixing sensors to chairs, or using cameras positioned above a table. One approach required users to wear a ring that emits infrared, which was then tracked by the touch-table's cameras.
Patrick Baudisch, professor of computer science at the Hasso Plattner Institute, who developed the prototype system with graduate students Stephan Richter and Christian Holz, says shoes are ideal to track because they offer distinct features such as colors, seams, laces, logos, or stripes. They also typically maintain contact with the ground, unlike hands on a tabletop or bottoms in chairs, so they're easier to track.
Baudisch stresses that Bootstrapper is not intended as a security feature. "People can always spoof the system by buying the same shoes as someone else," he notes. The goal is to make collaboration easier and to log different people's usage over many sessions. The researchers, for example, used it to summarize users' achievements in a mathematics software program.
Bootstrapper collects video of shoes using cameras positioned below the surface of the table. Software extracts information about the texture of the shoe and links it with actions on the touch screen that correspond to hands and arms aligned with the shoes. With a small sample of 18 users and 18 different shoes, the researchers demonstrated that the system could recognize a user with 89 percent accuracy.
- 1
- 2







andrewppp
8 Comments
An ecstacy of lameness
18 people and 86% accurate with sophisticated software and some hardware? Unbelievable. How about 100% accuracy for 1,000 people using no hardware and bone-simple software?
Each user is assigned a 3-digit number.
Next.
Reply
yuevbot
27 Comments
Re: An ecstacy of lameness
Agreed. Anything less than 99.9% accuracy is worthless as you'd need to confirm that it actually recognized you before proceeding. This is more intrusive -- and takes longer -- than just doing a quick login.
Sounds like a typical "grad student looking for a project" idea. In other words, something that demonstrates skills without doing anything useful.
Reply
jsebring
35 Comments
Re: An ecstacy of lameness
Well keep going with that idea. Let's name you
6E657264-64697465
as your global unique identifier.
Reply
yuevbot
27 Comments
Re: An ecstacy of lameness
Two problems with your comment:
1.The identifier only needs to be locally unique, not globally -- 2 or 3 digits is plenty.
2. You only need 10 digits, or 7 letters & numbers, to be globally unique.
Reply
jsebring
35 Comments
Re: An ecstacy of lameness
:) ok I'll translate. It was a joke for the geeks to understand only.
I wrote his nickname in hexidecimal that was saying he was a ludite nerd which is a little oxy moron kind of like someone prefers typing over siri (if siri was truly mature).
Reply
yuevbot
27 Comments
Re: An ecstacy of lameness
If you want people to see a joke, you need to obscure it a little less.
"nerd-dite" in ASCII is not exactly something that springs off the page. This particular "joke" is more likely to be recognized on a hacker forum instead of a general knowledge site.
Reply
jsebring
35 Comments
Re: An ecstacy of lameness
Yes, only a few will get that true. But you see the point of what I was saying? You are going back in time with your identifier idea in the first place. Computers are heading toward invisibility so we don't have to even know we are using one like having a conversation or watching an animated movie responding to our touch, gestures and voice. Point and click and typing are not forward thinking, especially people entering codes into the screen. Do you get my meaning?
Reply